Back to our homepage

Learn more about CSEUnited

Keeping an EYE on SEIU

Get involved in our Campaigns

Resources that will empower you

We want to hear from you

 

 

Margarita Maldonado's motion to change recall policy

 

How did your representative vote?

 

What is the Local 1000 Council?

 

 


 

Help Fund the Fight

Help us continue our campaign to protect your rights both at work and within the union

 


 

Having problems at work or getting any help from the union?

 


 

Join CSEUnited Today!

Join other members who have chosen to take an active part in taking their union back

 

eyes on seiu page

 

Hard and Hackett protect cronies

 

Originally Published December 7, 2006

 

It was another sad day for members’ rights and union democracy when the Local 1000 Council, urged on by President Jim Hard and Secretary-Treasurer Cathy Hackett, voted December 3 to change union rules, which allowed members to recall elected officers.  President Jim Hard repeatedly ignored a request by a CSEUnited member of the Council to have a roll call vote and instead took the vote by hand – making it difficult to record how Council members voted.  A partial list of the vote is available by clicking here.

 

The change in policy was prompted by the fact that recall efforts are underway in seven District Labor Councils.  All the persons who were subjects of the recalls voted to approve the dues increase and are all known supporters of Hard and Hackett.  “It should be obvious to everyone that this change was designed to protect Hard and Hackett’s cronies.  I guess you can call this the Incumbent Protection Act.” said Laurie Lyon-Diaz from DLC 723.

 

The change, authored by Unit 1 and IT Committee Chair Margarita Maldonado and Unit 15 Chair Robyn Sherles, would prohibit any portion of the recall process (which usually takes place around a six month period), from occurring during any regularly scheduled union election.  This change significantly narrows the window period for recalling officers and some have argued would effectively make the union’s recall procedures irrelevant. 

 

To add insult to injury, the Local 1000 Agenda Committee, chaired by none other than Ms. Hackett, added the proposal as an “emergency item” to the Council’s meeting agenda on the same day as the Council meeting.  This maneuver allowed the item to bypass the usual advance notice required of most items that require a vote of the Council.

 

“It’s ironic that Hard and Hackett, founders of the so-called Caucus for a Democratic Union (CDU) within Local 1000, lobbied so hard to pass something that clearly tramples on the members’ democratic right to recall their elected officers.  Hypocrisy is not a strong enough a word to describe what they have done.” fumed Barbara Powers, a Chief Steward in DLC 769 and a CSEUNited activists in the Central Valley.

 

The amendment to the recall policy takes effect immediately and effectively kills any pending recall attempts. In one DLC, the proponent of the recall secured twice as many signatures as was required to recall the Chair of Bargaining Unit 14. “This just goes to show the extreme measures our officers will take to keep themselves and their cronies in power” stated Arnold Zuniga of DLC 785.”  

 

Hard, Hackett, and their cronies must be stopped! 

 

 

NOTE:

Portions of this article were edited because they involved request for members to participate in actions or campaigns that have already concluded.