|
Prior to collective bargaining, CSEA was governed by a board of directors
that included members elected by rank-and-file civil service
employees, retirees, state university workers and supervisors.
It was a system created during an earlier time when CSEA was
essentially the only organization representing most current and
former state employees.
With the advent of collective bargaining
and recognizing that the rank-and-file needed control of their
own affairs, CSEA put in place a reorganization that split the four
distinct classes of members into their respective "divisions".
The rank-and-file members of CSEA were placed in what was
then called
the "Civil Service Division" (CSD) of CSEA. This
division had its own elected and
"independent" governing board. However, because
the CSD was technically just a "subsidiary" of CSEA, the CSEA
board of directors still had final say over most matters.
In response, a group of rank-and-file members in the CSD
formed a "reform" group to advocate for
greater control over rank-and-file matters.
It was in this backdrop that calls for
incorporating the CSD became louder. Incorporation was a
legal process that would transform the CSD from
a subordinate "division" of CSEA to its own sub-corporation
within CSEA and give it legal standing and far greater autonomy.
A succession of administrations in CSEA fought incorporation. This
started an internal fight that plagued CSEA for years. In
2003, the matter was settled and the CSD was chartered as a new "incorporated affiliate" of CSEA.
To assert its new found independence, the new affiliate
abandoned any reference to CSEA in its name and is now called
SEIU Local 1000. CSEA's role in this new affiliate has
greatly diminished.
As an affiliate, Local 1000 has full control of and is
responsible for its budget, dues structure and programs.
Unfortunately, the saga did not have a happen ending. Many
former members of this reform group felt that the leaders of the
movement that gave Local 1000 full power to manage the affairs
of the union later abused that responsibility and started running
the union no differently than their predecessors.
So, a move to "reform the reform movement" was born. This
was the impetus for creating CSEUnited.
|